Updated: January 22, 2012 2:29AM
Several new books point to the fact that wars are becoming scarcer and we as people are becoming less violent as a result.
Joshua Goldstein, professor emeritus of international relations at American University, author of Winning the War on War, told a radio interviewer last month that there is measurably less violence this decade than in the past 100 years. World War II, which started 70 years ago, created levels of violence that were 100 times higher than the wars of today, including Iraq and Afghanistan.
When wars do conflagrate, there is more exposure to the bloody entrails of war, via the Internet and social media, which increases pressure for the violence to cease.
I have always thought that as people become more humane toward other people, they will become more aware of the socially ingrained tolerance we sport when it comes to cruelty to animals. Today’s young people are more aware of the brutality of factory farming and more are vegetarians.
And the more we learn about how animals think and the sophistication of their thinking, the more difficult it becomes to treat them as if they were unthinking, unfeeling machines.
Jonathan Balcombe, a scientist at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, echoes one of my long-held beliefs. The more we learn about animal intelligence, the more we see that it is we who have failed to understand animals and not the other way around.
“Chickens practice deception, pigeons can categorize images in photographs as quickly as we can, a gorilla plays a joke on a human teacher, and a tiny fish leaps from one tide pool to another using a mental map formed during high tide,” he says on the Discovery Channel website.
A new study by a University of Chicago researcher found that “rats are empathetic and will altruistically lend a helping paw to a cage mate who is stuck in a trap,” according to an NPR report. Not only will rats frantically work to free the trapped cage mate; they will do so even when there’s a tempting pile of chocolate chips nearby.
It is not surprising that the National Institutes of Health have revised the guidelines on cage sizes for mice and rats used in animal testing. It is no longer acceptable to crowd a female mouse and her litter into fewer than 51 square inches of space, or a female rat and her litter into fewer than 124 square inches of space. As tiny as those increased spaces are, scientists still worry the cost of compliance is too high and they stand to lose federal funding altogether if they don’t comply.
My hope is that as we become more human toward people and animals alike we will end the practice of animal testing for human medical advancements. The fact is our chemistry is quite different from that of animals. So animal experimentation is a highly unreliable precursor of how humans will react to new drugs, procedures.
The more we recognize the cruelty of violence toward people, the more we will also recognize the cruelty we now visit on animals.
Bonnie Erbe is a TV host and columnist.
Scripps Howard News Service